You need to watch this Video!!!
The President does not have, nor can he “borrow” the legislative powers of Congress and it will be Illegal to unilaterally rule on the issue of Immigration!
If Obama does what Senator Durbin predicts then Obama is Guilty of High Crimes and America has become a DICTATORSHIP!
Dick Durbin: Obama to ‘borrow’ Constitutional power to rule on immigration
June 28, 2014
If House Republicans do not act on immigration in the way Barack Obama wants soon, then the president will simply “borrow” Congress’ legislative powers and unilaterally rule on the issue, bypassing Congress once again, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said Thursday.
“I don’t know how much more time he thinks he needs, but I hope that Speaker Boehner will speak up today,” Durbin said. “And if he does not, the president will borrow the power that is needed to solve the problems of immigration.”
Democrats have issued an ultimatum to Republicans in the House, telling them that if they do not do Obama’s bidding on immigration by the end of July, the president will simply adopt the mantle of dictator and rule on his own.
“We’re at the end of the line,” Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., told reporters. “We’re not bluffing by setting a legislative deadline for them to act.”
On Wednesday, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., repeated his call for unilateral action when he declared immigration dead in the House and demanded Obama issue an executive order to curb deportations.
“Having been given ample time and space to craft legislation, you failed, the president now has no other choice but to act within existing law to ensure that our deportation policies are humane, that due-process rights are protected, that detention conditions are as they should be, and most importantly — that the people we are deporting are detriments to our communities, not assets to our families, economy, and society,” he said.
But the Constitution does not allow for Obama to simply “borrow” congressional power as Durbin suggests or write laws when he believes Congress is not acting as he wishes.
“The President does not ‘borrow power.’ He grabs it. He overreaches. He acts lawlessly. But, no, he can’t borrow power like a library book,” Cruz aide Amanda Carpenter tweeted.
“The White House saying it is going to ‘borrow’ power from Congress should send shivers down every American’s spine,” another person tweeted.
The Hill said Durbin’s threat came a day after House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, announced legislation allowing the House to sue Obama for overstepping his Constitutional authority.
“When there is a failure on the part of the president to faithfully execute the law, the House has the authority to challenge this failure,” Boehner said Wednesday.
But is a lawsuit enough to stop Obama from wielding his pen and his phone or ruling like the movie character “Judge Dredd?”
For years, various Republicans have threatened impeachment — the Constitutional cure Judge Andrew Napolitano said is the only way Congress can stop Obama’s executive actions. But nothing has been done and grassroots conservatives are becoming weary of talk with no action.
On Friday, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., tried to ease the minds of constituents concerned about Obama’s executive overreach with an email saying the Constitution’s system of checks and balances will ultimately keep the president under control, as it did when the Supreme Court unanimously ruled Obama’s recess appointments to the NRLB unconstitutional.
“I want you to know that I am listening,” she said. “I am working with my colleagues in Congress to hold the Administration accountable to you – and I am more confident than ever that our system of checks and balances will prevail.”
Wake Up America, 911 was a False Flag to take away our Rights!!!
Ukraine II-76 Crash Site
Plane was Shot Down and had Fuel, Weapons, Ammunition right? Yet Large Pieces are there to include the Rudder & other large parts!
Flight 93 Crash Site
Photo: Flight 93 Crash Site and NO Recognizable Plane Parts at all?
Pentagon Crash Site
NO Plane Parts to be seen at Pentagon! NO Wing Damage to the building on the sides of impact crater!!!
The name “3 percenter” comes from the fact that only 3 percent of colonial British subjects took up arms against the King during the revolutionary war. Three percent of the population was enough to overthrow a government and win independence.
The Chicago Police Department, working with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and FBI, has opened the Crime Gun Intelligence Center to crackdown on illegal guns from what they call “three-percenters.”
A number of agencies including Chicago PD, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the ATF, and other regional partners, will operate the new joint task force from within the ATF’s Chicago Field Division.
The target of this Crime Gun Intelligence Center: a group the ATF is referring to as “three-percenters.”
“It remains constant from year to year that about 40 percent of the crime guns recovered in the City of Chicago come from Illinois, and about 20 percent come from Indiana,” Carl Vasilko, ATF Special Agent in Charge, told WGN.
The core mission of the Crime Gun Center is to identify these shooters, or these ‘three percenters’ and the ‘traffickers’ that sell them guns and get them off our streets.”
As such, the new center is part of a shopping list of measures promised by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel when he debuted the city’s planned restrictions on gun stores inside the Windy City. Those planned regulations include videotaping sales and allowing access to Federal Firearms License holder’s inventory records.
“This is cool stuff, the center is a smart and sophisticated way of using cutting-edge science and technology to solve more violent crimes,” U.S. Attorney Zach Fardon told the local ABC affiliate.
According to the ATF’s 2013 gun trace data, 5,118 of the 10,915 guns recovered at a crime scene and ran through the agency in the Land of Lincoln were found in Chicago. Most of these came from 15 neighboring states, including a third from within Illinois.
“By combining all of these law enforcement databases,” Alfonza Wysinger, first deputy superintendent of the Chicago Police Department, told the Chicago Tribune. “We will greatly reduce the time it takes to get evidence back into the hands of our investigators.”
Article III the Constitution states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against… them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”
Q: Who is Al-Qaeda?—————————————- A: Our Enemy
Q: Who is the Taliban?————————————– A: Our Enemy
Q: Define “giving the Aid and Comfort” ——————A: ARMING THEM!
Obama Shattering: Judge Pirro; We Have Right To Remove Obama; Demand Impeachment
Full transcript via Fox News Insider: Judge Jeanine to Obama: ‘Your Actions Demand Impeachment’
There is a sacred trust between a country and its leader, between a president and the people he leads. When a leader violates that trust, the people from whom he derives his power have the inalienable right to remove him.
You may agree or disagree with what I’m about to say; it’s not meant to be political.
Whatever the context, when you let things slide – one after another – the foundation deteriorates. Even water sliding down a rock begins to wear at it and break it down. And like that rock, our very existence is in jeopardy. Barack Obama has put us in that jeopardy yet again.
The latest: exchanging a man whose own platoon soldiers call a “deserter,” who voluntarily left his unit during combat – in itself a death-eligible crime – for five of the worst Taliban terrorists in Gitmo.
Obama sends out old faithful Susan Rice to say this of Bowe Bergdahl:
“He served the United States with honor and distinction.”
What? Even the White House had to re-spin that.
Now Susan, isn’t English your first language? Weren’t you briefed on what to say? And not for nothing, don’t you know that those Sunday morning talk shows are a danger zone for you? But then again, that despicable video lie got you moved up to national security adviser.
And ironically, the reason for the trade:
“What we did was ensure that as always the United States doesn’t leave a man or a woman on the battlefield.”
Pray tell, Susan, is it OK to leave some behind?
The trade surprised even Congress:
“It comes with some surprise and dismay that the transfers went ahead with no consultation, totally not following the law.”
And that’s a Democrat!
Enter our president:
“We had a prisoner of war whose health had deteriorated, and we were deeply concerned about and we saw an opportunity and we seized it, and I make no apologies for that.”
But when key senators didn’t buy the “ill” excuse, a new narrative emerged: the Taliban would kill Bergdahl if you followed U.S. law and told Congress. Seriously?
Mr. President, my sources tell me you knew Bergdahl’s location for months. Why didn’t you send in SEAL Team 6? It would have made another great photo op. Why didn’t you send in those drones? Could it be, Mr. President, he was your excuse to release 5 Taliban terrorists from Gitmo? Those five men, the worst of the worst. Some wanted by the U.N. for mass murders, killing thousands, al Qaeda-connected, these are the guys who behead their enemies, including children. They hate America and everything we stand for. And you release them – knowing many return to the battlefield – because Arab country Qatar assured you that they do not pose a threat to us? And you’re good with that? You buy it? You think 12 years in Gitmo has softened their resolve to kill us?
Mr. President, you didn’t just release them, you unleashed them, and you and you alone will be responsible for the hell that will be unleashed on us. You have teed us up for death and destruction. And don’t give me this hogwash that they are prisoners of war who have to be freed when we leave Afghanistan. They are not prisoners of war. The Taliban is not a country. They are enemy combatants who can be held indefinitely and should have been tried for their crimes. And as much as you want to take terms like “Islamic extremists” and “jihad” out of our lexicon, the War on Terror is far from over.
You didn’t have to release them. And I don’t give a damn whether you try them at Gitmo, in a military tribunal or in a federal court. United States attorneys have prosecuted these dirt bags and convicted them time and again.
Here’s the bottom line: you negotiated with terrorists. You broke the very law that you signed. You have shown terrorists that they can win concessions by kidnapping Americans. In the history of this country we have never traded mass murderers for a deserter.
My father and grandfather fought in World War II. Ironically, you go to Normandy 70 years later – where my grandfather was injured – and make like you respect the military.
You call yourself a commander-in-chief. But what commander-in-chief doesn’t support a surge, but sends in 40,000 troops anyway? What commander-in-chief reduces benefits to to those in the military? Closes the Veterans War Memorial? Reduces the army to pre-World War II levels? Knowingly allows veterans to die in our hospitals, while replenishing the enemy in a time of war?
Mr. President: you are destroying this country. You have diminished us on the world stage. You have trampled on the very laws you swore to uphold. You are not a true commander-in-chief. We’ve impeached a president for lying about sex with an intern. Your actions, far more egregious, demand impeachment. – [.] – END -
Obamacare: watch out, here comes “predictive modeling”
By Jon Rappoport
June 5, 2014
Modeling or programming?
A Medai.com article, “Why is Predictive Modeling Essential to Healthcare?” offers this quote:
“…the algorithms of predictive modeling can analyze hundreds of data points to make a diagnosis or a prediction of risk.”
This is the new thing in American medicine, and everyone is climbing onboard. The idea is to combine diverse sets of data, to diagnose a patient—and also predict what illnesses will strike designated sectors of the population by identifying what social, economic, gender, and behavioral groups they belong to.
“Oh, yes, in USA population sector A-2ab, we can view the electronic health records of 10,000 patients who are single, under 30, live at home with their parents, have a history of ignoring medical advice, display symptoms of ADHD, graduated college with less than a 3.0 grade average, have taken prescription pain meds within the last five years…according to statistics, this group stands a better than 65% chance of developing clinical depression within the next 6.23 years. Therefore, we should prescribe them prophylactic antidepressants now, to save money on more expensive treatments later. If we utilize our algorithm and adjust code 4aQ1 and code 7B2Ex, we’ll be able to pinpoint which patients in this group need medication immediately…”
This is coming. The structure is being built now, across all medical and insurance organizations.
The hubris involved is outstanding, to say nothing of the intrusion on privacy, and the recent abysmal track record of government merely trying to sign people up for Obamacare.
Of course, the proponents of prediction are promising better patient outcomes, enormous $$ savings, and a Brave New World in which “at-risk” groups can be spared suffering before it occurs.
Managed Care has published an article, “More Data in Health Care Will Enable Predictive Modeling Outcomes.”
Here are two key quotes:
“Predictive modeling (PM) has grown to be a linchpin of care management. Health plans, integrated delivery systems, and other health care organizations (HCOs) increasingly channel their patients to interventions based in part on what they deduce from predictive models that have traditionally been run against databases of administrative claims. In this arena, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) [Obamacare] is likely to exert a profound effect.”
“…a growing number of health care experts, including the Care Continuum Alliance, see predictive modeling as an opportunity to prevent [disease] complications, control [hospital] readmissions, generate more precise diagnoses and treatments, predict risk, and control costs for a more diverse array of population segments than previously attempted.”
I could attack this gobbledegook PR in a number of ways, but I’ll cut to the real bottom line. The entirety of predictive modeling rests on the assumption that, in making disease and mental-disorder diagnoses, doctors are basically working from a correct playbook. Otherwise, they could massage data ’til the cows come home and they would commit disastrous blunder after blunder.
But the basic playbook is not correct. For all 300 officially certified mental disorders, there are, in fact, no defining physical tests for diagnosis. None. No blood tests, no urine tests, no brain scans, no genetic assays.
For germ-caused diseases, the “tried and true” diagnostic tests are completely misleading. The antibody tests are frequently false-positive, and the presence of antibodies, in the first place, merely indicates that the patient has contacted the germ in question. It says nothing about present or future illness. In fact, a positive antibody test often means the opposite of illness: the patient’s immune system has contacted the germ and thrown it off.
The PCR diagnostic test takes a tiny, tiny amount of what is purported to be genetic material from a germ, and amplifies it many times so it can be observed. But the hallmark of illness, when germs may be involved at all, is: you have millions of a particular bacteria or virus being very active—in which case, you didn’t need the PCR test in the first place. You needed the PCR because you couldn’t find enough germ material in the patient to knock over a fly.
So…place these irrelevant and misleading diagnostic tests into the predictive modeling framework, and what do you get? False predictions.
Then there are the medical drugs. I’ve cited the Starfield Review many times. July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” Dr. Barbara Starfield, from the Johns Hopkins of School of Public Health, pointed out that, every year in the US, FDA approved medicines kill 106,000 people. In our 2009 interview, Starfield told me this was a conservative estimate.
This is tragedy and murder on a massive scale, supported by what have to be deceitfully glowing studies done on the drugs and routinely published in leading medical journals.
No one in his right mind would believe that all this lying and crime, embedded in a new and advanced predictive model, would produce anything except expanded disaster.
With the bonus that you lose your medical privacy, and you are observed and data-mined in other ways—as a “unit” that belongs to various groups. And oh yes, you get toxic drugs before you’re sick. It’s predictive. Hail to the Chief.
Up the line, proponents of traditional/ natural health, nutritional supplements, and “alternative practices” will discover that, as independent humans, they’re anomalies. The official algorithms don’t include what they do to maintain health. Therefore, they’re outliers.
“Sorry, we can’t model you in our predictions. You don’t compute. You’re illegal. Oh, wait. You do fit into one category: Threat. Potential Danger to the State.”
The only Bill of Right we, as Americans, have left is the 3rd:
3. No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The US Federal Government has “Tread” on the other nine!
Read the “Declaration of Independence” and that the government in Washington, DC today, is actually worse than what King George could have wished to do to the Colonists!
Long Live the Constitutional Republic!!!